Traffic Signals

Signalizing busy intersections and providing signalized crosswalks help create safe routes to schools for children. New traffic signals are very expensive and must be warranted or they could cause more harm than good. Warrants for installing traffic signals are provided in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2003 Edition Chapter 4C.

Traffic signals are the highest form of traffic control. However, their benefit to the pedestrian network is contingent upon the application of several principles including:

Mark all legs of an intersection.
Pedestrian paths (marked crosswalks) should be provided on all sides of an intersection where pedestrian crossings are desired. A school walking route plan may limit crossings to three or fewer legs, but all options should be available for school officials to select the most desirable crosswalks to use.
Provide pedestrian signal heads in all directions.
Pedestrian signal indications (WALK, flashing DON'T WALK, DON'T WALK, or walking man and raised hand symbols) should be provided at every signalized crossing.
Only use pedestrian pushbuttons if they are needed.
Push buttons are generally appropriate at locations with low or intermittent pedestrian activity. If used, they should be in clear view, wheelchair accessible and responsive to those who push the buttons.
Install landings on all corners.
Fully accessible landings should be in place on all corners to provide a safe place for people to wait.
Paint stop bars for motor vehicles on all approaches.
Stopping motor vehicles in advance of the marked crosswalk keeps the crosswalk clear for pedestrians and can reduce right-turn-on-red conflicts
Install curb ramps on each corner.
Two curb ramps per corner; eight per intersection is generally recommended, although there are situations where one diagonal ramp per corner is an acceptable option (e.g., where there is a wide turning radius and two ramps per corner is not feasible).
Provide streetlights on all four corners.

Treatment: Traffic Signal Installation

Description/Purpose

Signals that control the flow of traffic and provide sufficient time for safe and efficient pedestrian crossings.

Expected Effectiveness

When signals are installed at appropriate locations (where warranted) they should improve pedestrian safety and also reduce the severity of motor vehicle crashes, even though total motor vehicle crashes (including rear-end collisions) may increase. Research is limited on the effect of traffic signals on pedestrian crashes, although some pedestrian signal timing schemes have been shown to significantly reduce pedestrian crash risk.

Costs

Costs range from $30,000 to $140,000 (PEDSAFE, 2004).[3]

Keys to Success

  • Signal cycles should be kept short.
  • Marked crosswalks encourage pedestrians to cross at the signal.
  • Pedestrian actuation (pushbuttons) should only be used if the pedestrian volume is low enough to support it.

Key Factors to Consider

  • Potential increase of vehicular crashes (especially rear-end collisions).
  • Potential traffic diversion to adjacent streets.

Evaluation Measures

  • Motor vehicle–pedestrian crashes.
  • Pedestrian ability to complete their crossing before the steady DON’T WALK is displayed.
  • Signal compliance of pedestrians.

Traffic Signals and Adult School Crossing Guards

Traffic signals along a school route are often a good place to provide adult school crossing guards for elementary and middle school students. Wide signalized crossings may warrant two or more guards. Adult school crossing guards play an important role in the lives of children who walk or bicycle to school. They help children safely cross at key street locations and remind drivers of the presence of pedestrians. These activities can lead to more parents feeling comfortable about their children walking and bicycling to school. See Adult School Crossing Guard Guidelines for more information.

Traffic Signals: Intersections or Midblock Locations

Signalized crosswalks at an intersection and midblock crossing.

Signalized crosswalks can be placed at an intersection or at a midblock location, if warranted. Note that the stop bar shown on the midblock signal is set back further from the crosswalk at the signalized intersection on the left. This set back allows the pedestrian to better see and be seen by drivers. Also, the paint stripes on the right are placed so that the wheels of motor vehicles track between the paint and improve the life of the markings. This helps with the maintenance budget and helps keep the paint fresh and visible. Washington and Oregon State Departments of Transportation have adopted this design.

Left turn arrows can help to separate motor vehicle turning movements and pedestrians. However, the time given to the left turn arrow may result in less crossing times for pedestrians. A balance between the time of the left turn arrow for motor vehicles and the pedestrian crossing time should be established to eliminate or minimize pedestrian and motor vehicle conflict. The timing intervals should allow pedestrians to safely cross the street without impediment from left turning motor vehicles and allow motor vehicle traffic to flow to prevent congestion.

Modify Traffic Signal Phasing and/or Timing

The signal phasing and/or timing can be modified to increase the time available for pedestrians to cross, to give priority to the pedestrian at an intersection, and/or to provide a separation in time of motor vehicle and pedestrian crossings. The timing or phasing of traffic signals is a complex issue, impacted by the signal timing itself as well as other conditions at the crossing including pedestrian and driver behaviors. Factors that contribute to the complexity of traffic signal timing and phasing include:

  • Duration of time pedestrians must wait for the WALK signal.
  • Number of motor vehicle movements that conflict with the pedestrian WALK signal.
  • Amount of time that is provided for people to cross the street.
  • Speed at which people are walking.
  • Presence or absence of a button people have to push to get a walk indicator and adequate time to cross the street.
  • Presence or absence of one or more adult school crossing guards available to assist younger students while crossing the street. (See Adult School Crossing Guard Guidelines for more information.)

Treatment: Modified Traffic Signal Phasing and/or Timing

Description/Purpose

The signal phasing and/or timing can be modified to increase the time available for pedestrians to cross, to give priority to the pedestrian at an intersection, and/or to provide a separation in time of motor vehicle and pedestrian crossings. Lead Pedestrian Interval is an example of modified signal phasing/timing.

Expected Effectiveness

Studies of exclusive pedestrian timing have shown a reduction in pedestrian crashes by 50 percent in some downtown areas with high pedestrian volumes and low vehicle speeds and volumes. Other signal modifications have also resulted in a decrease in motor vehicle–pedestrian conflicts at intersections (e.g., leading pedestrian interval).[34]

Costs

The cost for adjusting signal timing is relatively low. The cost for installing new signals ranges from $20,000 to $140,000 (PEDSAFE, 2004).[3]

Keys to Success

  • Ensure that signals are placed so that they are visible to pedestrians and pushbuttons, if provided, are easy to reach.

Key Factors to Consider

  • Signal cycles should be kept fairly short to minimize pedestrian delay, but wider intersections may require longer cycle lengths.
  • The speed and volume of motor vehicles should also be considered in signal timing calculations and decisions.

Evaluation Measures

  • Number of conflicts with motor vehicles (especially turning vehicles) and pedestrians at intersections.

Minimize Pedestrian Wait Time

The longer people must wait to cross the street the more likely they will decide to cross against the signal. Pedestrian wait time can be reduced by shortening the overall signal cycle length or by providing an actuated demand-responsive pedestrian signal. Some pedestrians, especially large groups of children, may need more than the 4 feet per second standard that is used to calculate the time needed for the pedestrian clearance interval. However, longer pedestrian clearance intervals may result in longer signal cycle lengths, and thus longer wait times between WALK signals.

Pedestrian Pushbuttons

Studies show that 50 percent or fewer pedestrians use the push button to cross, yet if they do not use the button they may not get enough time to cross.[34]

Pedestrian pushbuttons are electronic buttons used by pedestrians to change traffic signal timing to accommodate pedestrian crossings. Pushbuttons may be needed at some crossings, but their use should be minimized. Signals can be put in pedestrian “recall” for key time periods of day such as school crossing times. During these periods the pedestrian WALK signal would be displayed every signal cycle. As traffic signals become more complex pedestrian pushbuttons are needed. If buttons exist, pedestrians must push them to get enough time to cross the street. Standard pushbuttons often result in longer waits to cross the street, especially if the pedestrian fails to push the button. Only about 50 percent of pedestrians actually push the buttons based on a Federal Highway Administration research project.[34] If used, they should be clearly visible and within easy reach for people in wheelchairs. Pushbuttons need to be checked periodically to assure that they are working and will place a call into the signal.

Treatment: Pedestrian Pushbuttons

Description/Purpose

Electronic buttons used by pedestrians to change traffic signal timing to accommodate pedestrian crossings.

Expected Effectiveness

  • Improves pedestrian travel time and compliance.
  • Reduces delay to vehicular traffic when pedestrians are not present.

Costs

Costs range from $400 to $1,000 per pushbutton.[35]

Keys to Success

  • Must be well signed, easily locatable and within reach of all pedestrians.
  • Should not be used where pedestrian traffic is frequent, as the pedestrian phase should be built into the cycle.
  • Buttons for neighboring crosswalks should be located at least 10 feet from each other.
  • Locator tones can assist visually impaired pedestrians to find the pushbutton.

Key Factors to Consider

  • Visually impaired pedestrians may have difficulty determining if a pushbutton is present.
  • Accessible pedestrian signals may need to be considered at some locations.

Evaluation Measures

  • Pedestrian volume.
  • Pedestrian compliance to WALK/DON’T WALK signal.

Reduce the Number of Motor Vehicle Movements that Conflict with Pedestrians

Standard concurrent signal timing illustrates conflicts that can arise between crossing pedestrians and turning motor vehicles.

Pedestrian and motor vehicle conflicts are a common occurrence when drivers get a green light and pedestrians get a green light or a WALK signal at the same time. While drivers are required to stop for pedestrians, conflicts are likely to occur. One solution is to install a “leading pedestrian interval” (LPI) which illuminates the pedestrian WALK signal, while the motor vehicle signal remains red for the first few seconds of the cycle. The LPI gives pedestrians an opportunity to start walking and establish a presence in the crosswalk before drivers can begin their turn. The LPI is usually about three seconds or more.

For more information visit the 2004 PEDSAFE "Leading Pedestrian Interval 2 of 2” St. Petersburg, Florida, case study.

NO TURN ON RED sign may reduce some pedestrian conflicts in the near-side crosswalk, but may increase conflicts in the adjacent crosswalk.

Drivers making a right turn at a red light are often looking left towards oncoming traffic and do not pay attention to pedestrians who may be approaching from the right. Restricting right-turn-on-red (RTOR) is another way to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and drivers at traffic signals. The RTOR restrictions can be limited to certain times of the day or can apply to all hours, prohibiting drivers from turning right without a green signal. The MUTCD identifies two conditions related to pedestrians when restricted RTOR may be most effective including:

  • Where an exclusive pedestrian phase exists.
  • Where an unacceptable number of pedestrian conflicts result from RTOR, especially conflicts involving children, older pedestrians or persons with disabilities.[36]

When RTOR is prohibited, there may be more right-turn-on-green conflicts between motor vehicles and pedestrians when both the right turning drivers have a green light and the pedestrian has the WALK signal on the adjacent crosswalk. The use of leading pedestrian intervals can reduce this effect. Prior to deciding to restrict RTOR, the advantages and disadvantages must be carefully considered.

Treatment: Right-turn-on-red Restrictions

Description/Purpose

Right-turn-on-red (RTOR) restrictions, which can be limited to certain times of the day or can apply to all hours, prohibit drivers from turning right without a green signal. Restricting this turning movement can reduce conflicts with pedestrians crossing at intersections.

Expected Effectiveness

Studies differ in terms of effectiveness, but the 2000 MUTCD identifies two conditions related to pedestrians when restricted RTOR may be most effective: 1) Where an exclusive pedestrian phase exists. 2) Where an unacceptable number of pedestrian conflicts result from RTOR, especially conflicts involving children, older pedestrians or persons with disabilities.[37], [36]

Costs

Costs associated with this treatment will vary widely based on conditions at the site, but are relatively low compared to other treatments. The average cost for a basic sign ranges from $30 to $150 plus installation costs of approximately $200 per sign (PEDSAFE, 2004).[3]

Keys to Success

  • NO TURN ON RED signs should be installed adjacent to the signal on the right side of the street and clearly visible to right-turning drivers. Enforcement programs can help establish compliance with the law.

Key Factors to Consider

  • RTOR restrictions may increase delay at intersections for motor vehicles and cause an increase in right-turn-on-green conflicts, but the use of leading pedestrian intervals can reduce this effect.

Evaluation Measures

  • Number of crashes and conflicts.
  • Pedestrian and driver compliance with intersection regulations.

Countdown Pedestrian Signals

Countdown pedestrian signal provide pedestrians with more information on how much time is left and are very well received by pedestrians.

Adequate time must be provided for pedestrians to cross the street safely. Countdown signals help by giving pedestrians information about how much crossing time remains. There is a good deal of confusion by most pedestrians on the meaning of the flashing DON'T WALK signal. While it technically means don’t start walking if the pedestrian has not yet started to cross the street, some pedestrians and drivers think that they are supposed to see the WALK signal for the entire crossing and they will not have enough time to cross as soon as the flashing begins. The countdown signal shows the number of seconds remaining to cross the street. Some studies have shown that countdown signals reduce the number of stragglers in the street when the signal changes, although some people may still start late.

Treatment: Countdown Pedestrian Signals

Description/Purpose

A timer display that counts down the seconds remaining for a pedestrian crossing.

Expected Effectiveness

  • Reduces the number of pedestrians caught in the crosswalk when the cycle ends.
  • Increases pedestrians’ perceived safety.

Costs

Costs range from $300 to $800 per signal.[38]

Keys to Success

  • Should give WALK message with countdown indication each cycle in areas with sufficient pedestrian volume.
  • Signals should be easily visible from both sides of crosswalks.
  • The countdown signals are more applicable where pedestrians are crossing streets with multiple lanes in each direction.

Key Factors to Consider

  • For wide streets, countdown pedestrian signals may be of particular benefit, especially if there are a substantial number of older pedestrians or persons with mobility disabilities who cross.

Evaluation Measures

  • Number of pedestrians caught in the crosswalk when the cycle ends.
  • Perceived pedestrian safety.

Accessible Pedestrian Signals

This accessible pedestrian push button not only has an audible tone when the WALK signal comes on, but it also has a vibro-tactile signal. This is for a crosswalk at a midblock traffic signal.

Accessible pedestrian signals (APS) are audible signals that indicate when it is or is not appropriate to cross the street. Federal Americans With Disabilities Act guidelines encourage the use of accessible pedestrian signals where there is a need to accommodate pedestrians with visual impairments. Accessible signals come in a variety of designs but include an audible signal and tactile (vibration) guidance for pedestrians. There are comprehensive resources providing information on accessible pedestrian signals available on the Web site of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (PBIC).

Treatment: Accessible Pedestrian Signals

Description/Purpose

Audible signals for the visually impaired that indicate when it is or is not appropriate to cross the street.

Expected Effectiveness

  • Audible signals increases awareness of all pedestrians, including those visually impaired, which can lead to fewer pedestrian crashes.[39]
  • Can decrease pedestrian cross time.

Costs

Costs range from $400 to $600 per signal.[40]

Keys to Success

  • Locator tones should be used to help persons with visual impairment find pushbuttons.
  • Appropriate sound levels should be used to limit audible intrusion into the surrounding neighborhood.

Key Factors to Consider

  • APS may be unclear as to which crosswalk it refers.
  • Directional guidance may be needed at wide, skewed or angled intersections.

Evaluation Measures

  • Motor vehicle and pedestrian crashes.
  • Motor vehicle–pedestrian conflicts.
  • Pedestrian crossing ability at current clearance interval.

Putting It Into Practice: HAWK Signals

Tucson, AZ

To increase pedestrian safety at school crossing locations, the City of Tucson developed a traffic signal called the HAWK (High-intensity Activated crossWalk). The HAWK uses traditional traffic and pedestrian signal heads but in a different configuration. It includes a sign instructing motorists to “stop on red” and a “pedestrians” overhead sign. There is also a sign informing pedestrians on how to cross the street safely.

When not activated, the signal is blanked out. The HAWK signal is activated by a pedestrian push button. The overhead signal begins flashing yellow and then solid yellow, advising drivers to prepare to stop. The signal then displays a solid red and shows the pedestrian a “Walk” indication. Finally, an alternating flashing red signal indicates that motorists may proceed when safe, after coming to a full stop. The pedestrian is shown a flashing “Don’t Walk” with a countdown indicating the time left to cross.

In 2004, the Tucson Department of Transportation installed five HAWK signals around the city and there are currently over 40 in operation. The special signals were placed at intersections where there were frequent crashes with pedestrians including streets near a university, a shopping center and a high school. The HAWK pedestrian crossing signals have greatly improved pedestrian safety in Tucson. The device substantially improves motorist stopping behavior, as compared to the use of flashing overhead school signs. The technology has been so successful that the Federal Highway Administration visited Tucson to look at the crossings and see how well they might work in other cities. Tucson has asked the FHWA for approval to include the HAWK for optional in the MUTCD.

For more information, visit the Tucson DOT website.